The Russian invasion of Ukraine has fuelled debate about who is ‘
European’. Yet, European identity is an elusive construct. A European identity can offer a sense of belonging to a group larger than the nation, prompting
solidarity with a larger collection of people. Youth are more likely to identify as European than their older
counterparts; moreover, childhood and adolescence are
crucial periods for identity development. Here, we synthesise research on the development of European identity across childhood, adolescence and young adulthood.
We conducted a
Rapid Evidence Assessment of European identity in 4-25 year olds, to understand (1) how to measure European identity, and what (2) predictors and (3) outcomes are linked with youth’s European identity.
The REA included 11 papers from disciplines such as psychology, education and sociology. Across the studies, five themes summarised how European identity is defined and measured in young people (Figure 1). The
Complexity of European identity is reflected in the lack of a consistent tool to measure European identity, and permeates the other themes. European identity is also
Ascriptive, as youth choose to identify as such, in search of the sense of
Belonging that it may bring. European identity is closely related to the EU motto,
United in Diversity, as we see both
Similarity – such as a shared culture, history, desires and political identity, and
Difference – as national subgroups under the ‘European’ umbrella have different historical, cultural and linguistic roots; there is variation in who identifies as European.
But, how is a European identity fostered? What implications does a European identity bring for those youth who hold it dear?
School-based interventions and tailored
curricula can contribute to stronger European identification among youth, though effects vary based on group membership and
status.
Artistic programmes give insight into European identity construction among younger children.
Knowledge about Europe and the EU give rise to stronger European identification, though political trust and the benefits of EU membership are stronger influences. Cross-border experiences through
travel and
friendships, and
higher socio-economic status contribute to stronger identification. In terms of the implications of European identity in youth, two main benefits have been identified: more positive intergroup
attitudes and
political participation.
There is a small but growing body of research on European identity among young people. Developing a measurement tool which taps into the complexities of the development of European identity is a fundamental next step in this research. Furthermore, only
one study focused on youth under age 12, pointing to the need to study childhood. Given the promising findings of school-based interventions, and the effect of such a (potentially) unifying identity on social inclusion and political participation, this is an exciting area for future research for the
142 million young people living in Europe today.
This blog was originally posted on the
Social Change Lab Blog.